Day 25: Zapotec, Isthmian, and Olmec Scripts
We learned about the Mayan script, which is our benchmark for Mesoamerican decipherment.
Dresden Codex
Mayan Calendar
Yuri Knorozov
As we learned a few weeks back, Maya glyphs encode syllables (CV), not individual sounds.
Signs can be combined, substituted, and stacked — but the underlying phonetic logic is consistent once you know the system.
Using the CV syllabary:

Monte Albán, Oaxaca. Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA

Huehueteotl, God of Fire Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA

Cascajal Block, Veracruz. Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA
Using the links on your handout, find answers to these questions for each of the three scripts:
Your handout has a specific text sample for each script. Look carefully at each one and answer:
Using everything from Stages 1 and 2, complete the ranking table on your handout:
| Script | Corpus | Anchor | Language ID | Falsifiable? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapotec | ||||
| Isthmian | ||||
| Olmec |
Then answer:
If you had to dedicate your career to deciphering one of these three scripts, which would you choose — and why?
| Script | Corpus | Anchor | Language ID | Falsifiable? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapotec | Large | ✅ Strong | Probable | Partial |
| Isthmian | Tiny | ✅ Long Count | Contested | Failed once |
| Olmec | One text | ❌ None | Unknown | ❌ No |
No bilingual text. No confirmed phonetic values. No living tradition of reading them.
And yet — they are not equally mysterious.
The difference is corpus, anchor, and falsifiability.